J. W.C. Shull v. Doerr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien. The plaintiff’s complaint named F. B. Doerr and Silvio Osti and a number of fictitious individuals as defendants. The record discloses that summons was served on Doerr, that he did not answer, and that his default was entered. The record also discloses that summons was served on the defendant Osti, that he did answer, and that as to him a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the defendant and from a judgment entered thereon the plaintiff has appealed, and has brought up typewritten…
2Cited by7 opinions
- R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- E. D. McGillicuddy Construction Co. v. Knoll Recreation Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City of Bell v. American States Water & Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ware Supply Co. v. Sacramento Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Balestreiri v. ArquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.