Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 26, 1984PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIE, Justice:

In this case we must redefine the rebut-table presumption arising from the possession of recently stolen goods. We also decide that prior convictions must be separate prior convictions to justify the imposition of life imprisonment without parole under the provisions of the habitual offender’s act.

The defendant, Graylin Hall, was indicted for burglary in the second degree and theft. It was alleged that Hall entered a dwelling and stole a bed sheet, two pillow cases, and a large quantity of coins.

At trial in Superior Court, the victim testified that his house had been entered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Willie E. Pendergrast v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Oney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Siple v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Buckingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Capital Management Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API