Legal Opinion
Gerson v. New York State Attorney-General
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 18, 1988No. Claim No. 75436PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a claim to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the Attorney-General in the prosecution of a business fraud, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Margolis,. J.), dated October 6, 1987, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Inasmuch as the claimant’s allegations against the defendant involve the exercise of discretion by the Attorney-General to which governmental immunity attaches (see, Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511; Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34; Rottkamp v…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Rottkamp v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Tarter v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brenner v. County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blouin ex rel. Estate of Pouliot v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Blouin v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Santora v. Sheldon SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Santora v. SilverNew York Supreme Court · 2008