Legal Opinion

Retractable Techs., Inc. v. Becton Dickinson & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 26, 2019No. 17-40960PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

A jury found that Becton Dickinson & Co. falsely advertised its products for years. The district court determined that neither disgorgement of profits nor further injunctive relief would be equitable under the circumstances. It did not abuse its discretion. We affirm.

I

This case involves a narrow subset of medical syringes: retractable syringes, a type of "safety syringe" designed to reduce risk of accidental needlesticks. Retractable syringes compete both with other varieties of safety syringes and with "conventional" syringes. Although retractable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Seatrax, Inc. v. Sonbeck International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. Rolex Watch v. BeckertimeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  3. Boltex Mfg. Co. v. Ulma Piping U.S. Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
  4. Airhawk International, LLC v. Ontel Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Boltex Manufacturing Company v. Galperti, ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API