Legal Opinion

Fitworks Holdings v. Pitchford-El, 88634 (5-24-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 2007No. 88634PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} This appeal is before the court on the accelerated docket pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc. App.R. 11.1.

{¶ 2} Defendant-appellant, Juan Pitchford-El ("Pitchford-El"), appeals the trial court's dismissal of his counterclaim and motion for sanctions. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.

{¶ 3} Pitchford-El entered into a contract with plaintiff-appellee, Fitworks Holdings L.L.C. ("Fitworks"), for a gym membership. As part of the contract, the parties agreed that monthly payments would be electronically deducted from Pitchford-El's bank account. According to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National City Bank v. FlemingOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Fant v. SykesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Newman v. Al Castrucci Ford Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. City of Solon v. Solon Baptist Temple, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bikkani v. Lee, 89312 (6-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Hinton v. Ohio Bureau of Sentence ComputationOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Marconi v. SavageOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Woods v. DouglasOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Schiff v. DicksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API