Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Ohio Bureau of Sentence Computation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 2018No. 17AP-187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Morris K. Hinton, appeals a decision and entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas entered February 23, 2017, that granted summary judgment to defendants-appellees, Ohio Bureau of Sentence Computation ("OBSC") and Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction ("ODRC") (collectively referred to as "appellees"). Because we agree with the trial court that credit for good behavior is deducted from the minimum but not the maximum measures of an indeterminate sentence, we overrule Hinton's assignment of error and affirm.

I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE

{¶ 2} On December 19,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BulgerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Nationstar Mtge., L.L.C. v. Bates-BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. BallardOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. HeidelburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API