Legal Opinion

Jianniney v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 10, 2008No. 350, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal we consider whether Mapquest printouts of distances and driving times are admissible. The trial court admitted the Mapquest printouts, over appellant’s objection, under the hearsay exception for “published compilations, generally used and relied upon by the public or by persons in particular occupations.” 1 There was no evidence, however, to support the trial court’s implicit finding that the Mapquest information is, in fact, generally used and relied upon. The only foundation for the introduction of this evidence was one witness’s statement that he was familiar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coppola v. Ferrellgas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Gordon v. Lewistown HospitalDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Saco v. Tug Tucana Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ronald Shaw v. New Castle CountyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API