Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Quality Restaurants Concepts (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 10, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00980Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RODNEY J. MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:20-cv-980-RAH-SMD ) Q.R.C., d/b/a APPLEBEES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Rodney J. Murphy’s (“Murphy”) Second Amended Complaint, which is pending the Court’s review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Second Amended Compl. (Doc. 9). Murphy alleges that he was subjected to a hostile work environment and retaliation while employed at Applebee’s. See generally

id.

For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API