Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Tucker

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 18, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

273 N.J. Super. 410 (1994)

642 A.2d 409

LILLIAN MCCLELLAND, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ROBERT TUCKER AND MITTIE GRAY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 21, 1994.

Decided May 18, 1994.

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., and THOMAS and LEVY.

James P. McHugh, III, argued the cause on behalf of appellant Mittie Gray (Leary, Bride, Tinker & Moran, attorneys; James P. McHugh and Brian Peoples, on the brief).

Randall S. Bruckman argued the cause on behalf of appellant Robert Tucker (Maloof, Lebowitz & Bubb, attorneys; Randall S. Bruckman, on the brief).

Pamela Mandel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Goldstone v. TuersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kopin v. Orange Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Stephanie Washington v. Carlos Perez, Olympia Trails & Olympia Trails Bus Company (072522)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. Finderne Mgmt. Co. v. BarrettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Mango v. Pierce-CoombsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  5. Jefferson v. FreemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API