STOLTZ v. McCONNON
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
When members of bodies politic charged with conducting essential public services fall out among themselves, the litigation which it seems must inevitably follow always has two features in common with all other such political contests at law. The first is a surfeit of lawsuits intended, no doubt, to demonstrate the magnitude and sincerity of each faction’s outrage at the alleged falsity, if not wickedness, of.'the other’s actions. The second common characteristic of this kind of litigation is that the principal issue raised by the excess of actions, if not always easy to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Craig v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Meixell v. Hellertown Borough CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fortney v. WozneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Munce v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Ross v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stoltz v. McConnonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. WeinerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Weiner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- STOLTZ v. McCONNONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. WeinerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.