Legal Opinion
Tarr v. Multnomah County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 19, 2020No. A173800PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
26 Argued and submitted July 8; affirmed on petition, cross-petition dismissed as moot August 19, 2020; petition for review denied January 21, 2021 ( 367 Or 496) Skip TARR and Ruth Tarr, Petitioners Cross-Respondents, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, and Masjid IBRAHIM, Ahmed Omer, and Arshad Ashfaq, Respondents Cross-Petitioners. Land Use Board of Appeals 2019097; A173800
473 P3d 603
Petitioners Skip and Ruth Tarr petition for judicial review, and respondents Masjid Ibrahim, Ahmed Omer, and Arshad Ashfaq (intervenors) cross-petition for review, of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Boyajian v. GatzunisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- In Re the Marriage of ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Bialostosky v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- PGE v. Alfalfa Solar I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023