Legal Opinion

State v. McQueen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 2020No. A168469PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

540 Argued and submitted January 30, reversed November 18, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STEVEN X. McQUEEN, aka Steven Zavier McQueen, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 17CR82739; A168469

478 P3d 581

Defendant, who surreptitiously recorded an otherwise consensual sexual encounter, appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of second-degree inva- sion of personal privacy, ORS 163.700(1)(b). That count required that the state prove that the person defendant recorded had “a reasonable expectation of pri- vacy concerning” her “intimate area.” ORS…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pete's Mountain Homeowners Ass'n v. Oregon Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Catholic Health InitiativesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. BerkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. BerkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API