Legal Opinion
Grasso v. United States Postal Service
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 17, 1977No. Civ. H-33PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
On the basis of a four-count complaint, plaintiffs Ralph M. Grasso and Oleante A. Pimpinella seek $3.3 million in damages from the defendants, the United States and the United States Postal Service (“U.S.P. S.”). The defendants have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the action because of a lack of subject matter jurisdiction in this court.
I
The determination of whether this court has jurisdiction over all or any part of the subject matter of this action turns largely upon the nature of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, Angelo J. Gaetano, Richard P. Evans, John Does I, Ii, and IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Beckman v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Continental Cablevision of St. Paul, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Active Fire Sprinkler Corp. v. The United States Postal Service and John T. Brady and Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- John M. Jackson v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.