Legal Opinion
Feiber v. Copeland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 29, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
As the issues were finally framed the action is for moneys had and received and is predicated upon an implied promise on the part of the defendant to repay the sum of $5,000, which is being held by the United States Mortgage and Trust Company to the credit of this action.
The plaintiff is a dress designer of high repute in her calling and earns substantial remuneration. The defendant is an attorney and for about a year prior to October 26, 1927, had represented the plaintiff professionally in dealings with her employers and in several actions. Discussions Were had between them, and plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitehead v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Kraus v. . BirnbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- In re MerrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Matter of DolphinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re SomervilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sherrier v. RichardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Canaday Cooler Co. v. Staten Island Shipbuilding Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Hiesiger v. HiesigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Securities Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Securities Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942