Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 3, 1992No. Court 88-02-00094PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GOLDBERG, Judge:
Plaintiff St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) brought this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988) challenging the denial by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) of its protest regarding the liquidation of forty-one entries of merchandise. St. Paul contends that the merchandise was liquidated by operation of law at the rate of duty claimed by the importer at the time of entry because Customs improperly extended the time for liquidation of the entries. Defendant asserts that it properly extended the time for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arlett Peoples v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Lavelle Stevens, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Wayne Stevens, Deceased v. James A. Barnard, Iii, D/B/A Mid-Continent BellancaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Pent-R-Books, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Detroit Zoological Society v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (Surety for Carreon, Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Compass Insurance Company v. H.P. Moore, and Moore Flying, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Peer Chain Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Eagle Cement Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993