Peerless Inv. Co. v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner herein seeks a review of a decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals finding a deficiency in petitioner’s 1929 income tax of $2,728.92 and denying his claim for refund of $5,688.91, the tax already paid for the year in question.
In 1928 one William L. James, acting on behalf of the Pacific Stages Company, an Oregon corporation, and on behalf of all its stockholders, of which he was one, sold to the Southern Pacific Motor Transport Company, a competitor, an option to purchase the entire stock of Pacific Stages. The consideration for the sale was to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nicoli v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Lang's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Herder v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Weicker v. HowbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Larchfield Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965