Crandell v. Larkin and Jones Appliance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court granting a motion to dismiss a products liability action against a commercial seller of used products. We reverse and remand.
On February 4, 1978, Gloria (Mrs. A.L.) Crandell (appellant) purchased a used Coronado clothes dryer from Larkin and Jones Appliance Company, Inc. (appellee). The dryer, which was displayed on appellee’s sales floor, had a tag affixed to it which described the machine as “Larkin and Jones Quality Reconditioned Unit” which was “Tag-Tested” and “Guaranteed.” In addition to these written…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Engberg v. Ford Motor CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Turbines, Inc. v. Dardis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- Hanson v. Funk Seeds InternationalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,943 David King v. Damiron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.