Legal Opinion

Crandell v. Larkin and Jones Appliance Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1983No. 13942PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court granting a motion to dismiss a products liability action against a commercial seller of used products. We reverse and remand.

On February 4, 1978, Gloria (Mrs. A.L.) Crandell (appellant) purchased a used Coronado clothes dryer from Larkin and Jones Appliance Company, Inc. (appellee). The dryer, which was displayed on appellee’s sales floor, had a tag affixed to it which described the machine as “Larkin and Jones Quality Reconditioned Unit” which was “Tag-Tested” and “Guaranteed.” In addition to these written…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Engberg v. Ford Motor CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Peterson v. Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  2. Turbines, Inc. v. Dardis, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  3. Hanson v. Funk Seeds InternationalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,943 David King v. Damiron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API