Legal Opinion

United States v. Three (3) Trade Boosters

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 5097PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

The United States of America filed a Libel of Information praying for the seizure and condemnation of three Trade Boosters under the provisions of Public Law 906, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, Sec. 7,15 U.S.C.A. § 1177.1 The Trade Boosters were seized at. Williamsport, Pennsylvania, by Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation acting under authority of the Attorney General.

Frank J. Zaydell, of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, answered the Libel of Information alleging ownership of the machines. Claimant Zaydell alleged that the Trade Booster devices were not gambling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. 24 Digger Merchandising MacHines Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert J. Ansani, Harvey Milner, John Edward Moore, Joseph J. Aiuppa and Ray JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. 294 Various Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. United States v. AnsaniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
  4. United States v. One Hundred Thirty-Seven (137) Draw Poker-Type MacHines & Six (6) Slot MacHinesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
  5. United States v. Two-Hundred-Ninety-Four Various Gambling DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API