Legal Opinion

Forney v. Brodie

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1934No. Civ. 5286PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This appeal from a judgment of nonsuit rendered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff arose from an action for malicious prosecution. Plaintiff appeared in propria persona and prosecuted the action in forma pauperis. Present counsel on appeal did not appear of record in the ease until the settlement of the bill of exceptions, and entered the case solely for the purpose of prosecuting this appeal.

It seems from the various pleadings on file that plaintiff is or was a builder or building contractor and registered as such with the state registrar of contractors. About the eighth day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beckman v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berger v. MantleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. In Re GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. In Re GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API