Legal Opinion

Bissell v. Dickerson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 19, 1894PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Action by the indorsee against the maker of a negotiable note to recover $100, the amount thereof; brought to the City Court of Hartford and tried to the jury before MaManus, J.; verdict for plaintiff for $25.00, only, and appeal by the plaintiff for an alleged error in the charge of the court.

Read the full summary

Action by the indorsee against the maker of a negotiable note to recover $100, the amount thereof; brought to the City Court of Hartford and tried to the jury before MaManus, J.; verdict for plaintiff for $25.00, only, and appeal by the plaintiff for an alleged error in the charge of the court. The defendant, in her defense, claimed and offered evidence to prove that the note in question was an accommodation note executed by her for the benefit of the payee, and was obtained by the latter by misrepresentation and fraud, of which the plaintiff had knowledge before he purchased the note. The…

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This case comes before us on a reservation for our advice, as to the granting of a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the evidence; and also on an appeal by the plaintiff, assigning error in the charge to the jury.

The advice to be given depends on the construction and effect of chapter LI of the Public Acts of 1893, and involves a consideration of the question whether, since its enactment, trial courts have power, as at common law, to set aside verdicts which, in their opinion, are manifestly against the weight of evidence.

Such a power was given as early as 1644 to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  3. Bartholomew v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
  4. Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  5. Tomlinson v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Waterbury Teachers Assn. v. FurlongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. State v. CarboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. Burr v. HartySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API