Ferrous Products Co. v. Gulf States Trading Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Justice.
Appellee sued appellant for the value of certain steel beams. He recovered judgment for $1,892.80 together with attorney’s fees of $500. Recovery was allowed by the Trial Court on the theory of an implied contract, the appellant having received and disposed of the beams.
There is no real dispute in the facts. On or about May 12, 1955, a man named Borden contacted Mr. Chenowith, who was employed by appellee, and asked if appel-lee would be interested in selling the beams to Metallic Building Company. Borden was in Houston and Chenowith was in Dallas. Chenowith answered that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gould v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. PointsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Johnson v. GattegnoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Stidham v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Southwestern Electric Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Ferrous Products Co. v. Gulf States Trading Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1960
- Ligon v. E. F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Morey v. Page, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- MAGNOLIA FED. S & L ASSOCIATION v. Randal Craft Realty Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.