Sentry Safety Control Corp. v. Jaybee Amusement Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadteeld, J.,
This is an appeal by defendant from the order of the court below discharging a rule to show cause why a judgment in the sum of $647.77 entered against it, pursuant to a warrant of attorney contained in a written agreement between it and plaintiff company, should not be opened and defendant be permitted to defend.
Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the leasing of automatic fire control devices which are attached to motion picture projectors in motion picture theaters.
The defendant is the owner and operator of certain motion picture theaters including one known as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Timlin v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Corona Coal & Coke Co. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. EverhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Shafer v. SensemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walker v. SaricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Wissahickon Realty Corp. v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956