Legal Opinion

Sun Dial Corp. v. Rideout

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 2, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 375 (1954)

106 A.2d 747

SUN DIAL CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

CARL D. RIDEOUT, JAMES L. RIDEOUT, ROBERT A. WHITFIELD, NANCY ORI WHITFIELD AND PRECISION MARKING CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted June 28, 1954.

Decided July 2, 1954.

Before Judges CLAPP, SMALLEY and SCHETTINO.

Mr. F.O. Miniutti for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Davidson & Miniutti, attorneys).

Mr. Walter D. Van Riper for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Van Riper & Belmont, attorneys).

The opinion of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Metals, Etc. Corp. v. Dixon ChemicalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Sun Dial Corp. v. RideoutSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. State v. KaufmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API