Legal Opinion

Curtis v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1993No. 80A02-9304-CV-191Published

1Opinion of the Court

625 N.E.2d 496 (1993)

Vance CURTIS, Appellant-Defendant,

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff.

No. 80A02-9304-CV-191.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.

December 14, 1993.

Jane Ruemmele, Indianapolis, for appellant-defendant.

Pamela Carter, Atty. Gen., Geoff Davis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee-plaintiff.

SHIELDS, Judge.

This case presents the issue of whether an attorney's failure to appear for a scheduled trial date is direct or indirect contempt.

FACTS

Vance Curtis is the prosecutor in Tipton County, Indiana. On January 12, 1993, Curtis failed to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Denny v. State Ex Inf. BradyIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In Re YengoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. LaGRANGE ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In the Matter of LemondIndiana Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API