Boyington v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this case, Petitioner raises several issues related to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We deny the petition in all respects except as to the issue of the imposition of lump sum fines and costs, for which the State correctly concedes error. While statutorily-mandated costs may be imposed without notice (and thus, need not be individually announced at sentencing), discretionary costs or fines must be orally pronounced at sentencing in order to com*328port with due process requirements. Sharpe v. State, 115 So.3d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Smiley v. State, 704 So.2d 191, 195…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Nix v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Smiley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Cupon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Sharpe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Jacob Hornstra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017