Strong v. State

Jeremy Strong raises four claims, of which only the first has merit, in his We deny the petition as to claims two, three, and four without discussion. In his first claim, Strong argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to challenge his fees because the trial court imposed fees under repealed and renumbered statutes and because Strong was not informed of his right to challenge the discretionary public defender fee. We agree, grant the petition in part, and remand for the lower court to strike the fees and…