Manley v. Harer
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark
This is the second appeal in this ease; the first was from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained. (Manley v. Harer et al., 73 Mont. 253, 235 Pac. 757.)
The complaint contains three causes of action, the charging parts of which are so similar that for present purposes they may be treated as one. It alleges that plaintiff, a resident of Broadwater county, has been for several years engaged in teaming, road construction and similar work as a means of earning a livelihood for himself and family; that, since March 1, 1921, up to the time of the commencement of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Manley v. HarerMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Cooper v. RomneyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- McLean v. MerrimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Wagner v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Ross v. WardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Small v. McRaeMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Edquest v. Tripp & Dragstedt Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
- Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Sherrard v. HullCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Emery v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.