Fink v. Goldblatt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, entered on May 9, 1962, so far as appealed from, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The Mexican decree approves and incorporates the separation agreement and orders the parties to comply with it. As the validity of the decree is in no wise questioned, its consequent recognition by our courts (see Gould v. Gould, 235 N. Y. 14, 28, 29) precludes the impairment of its mandate which the requested annulment of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gould v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Rehill v. RehillNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Schacht v. SchachtNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Hoyt v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Fink v. GoldblattNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Galyn v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Perlmutter v. PerlmutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Barrett v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Seidel v. WernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Avery v. AveryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.