Legal Opinion

Fink v. Goldblatt

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivern, J.

This is a motion for leave to serve an amended answer by adding affirmative defenses and to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction of the subject of the action or to dismiss for legal insufficiency.

The amended complaint seeks to rescind a separation agreement which provides for support of two children in defendant wife’s custody. The answer consists of a general denial of the material allegations of the complaint. The proposed amended answer seeks to add affirmative defenses of a Mexican divorce decree by due process and the incorporation therein of the separation agreement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Adams v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Ritzwoller v. . LurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Central Savings Bank v. Amted Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fink v. GoldblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API