Legal Opinion

Christman v. Southern Surety Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 11, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover from the surety on a public contractor’s bond the amount claimed to be due plaintiff for materials furnished for the construction of a sewer in the village of Spring Lake.

Motions for directed verdict made by both parties at the close of the proofs recognize that the determination of this ease depends substantially upon the construction to be given that portion of section 2, of Act No. 384, of the Public Acts of Michigan of 1925, which relates to the notice of indebtedness or of furnishing materials to be given to- officers or agents…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Equitable Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API