City of Richmond v. Williams
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, Part II, in a condemnation proceeding. To a judgment fixing the amount of damages petitioner assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The city of Richmond desiring to widen Seventh street between McDonough and Semmes streets, in Washington ward, filed its petition in the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, Part II, making T. C. Williams, the owner, party defendant, and asking for the appointment of commissioners to ascertain what would be a just compensation to him for the land proposed to be condemned for its uses. Such proceedings were had that the Alleghany Box Company, a tenant of T. C. Williams, Jr., of the premises in question, was also made a party defendant.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Richmond, Petersburg & Carolina Railroad v. Chamblin & ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Flesher v. HaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Hunter's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Allen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Harvey Textile Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- AGCS Marine Ins. Co. v. Arlington Cnty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Fonticello Mineral Springs Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.