Legal Opinion

Tanzler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 9, 2009No. 5D08-2949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EN BANC

TORPY, J.

In this direct appeal from his criminal conviction, Appellant filed a pro se Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion after we permitted him to file an initial brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), but before we permitted counsel to withdraw. Our Clerk, in reliance on Rodriguez v. State, 881 So.2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), ordered Appellant’s counsel to show cause why Appellant’s rule 3.800(b)(2) motion should not be stricken because it was not signed by counsel and not timely filed. Having considered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Proctor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API