Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Shires

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1884PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for tlie First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Sidney Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action brought by James G-. Ostrander, against the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company, to recover damages for an injury received in Michigan City, Indiana, at the crossing of the railroad track with Franklin street, on the morning of November 21, 1881. The trial of the cause in the circuit court resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, which, on appeal, was affirmed in the Appellate Court.

In the first count of the declaration it is averred that Michigan City is a duly incorporated city under the laws of Indiana, and had power to pass ordinances…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. President & Trustees of the Town of Mendota v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Cooke v. OrneIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. McGonigle v. DaughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. City of Chicago v. DidierIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. LikesIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Lyons v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API