Legal Opinion

Henretty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 2014No. 1D13-0504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Scott Henretty presents a timely claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. He correctly maintains that, in his appeal to this court in 2011, see Henretty v. State, 75 So.3d 722 (Table) (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the trial court erred by not renewing the offer of counsel at the entry of his guilty plea and again at sentencing. At the time the petitioner entered his guilty plea and was sentenced, he was proceeding pro se, having previously dismissed his attorney and been *56found competent to represent himself at trial. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Monte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Beard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Donald O. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Isaaih X Ash v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API