Legal Opinion
Neal v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 20, 2014No. 1D13-0203PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
CLARK, J.
We grant Appellant’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw our previous opinion filed on February 21, 2014, and substitute the following in its place.
This is an Anders1 appeal from Appellant’s conviction and habitual felony offender (“HFO”) sentence after the entry of Appellant’s mid-trial nolo contendere plea. The public defender submitted an Anders brief and Appellant was afforded the opportunity to file a pro se brief but did not do so. This Court’s “full and independent review,” as described in In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149, 151 (Fla.1991), revealed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. CauseySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- KANDACE M. WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- ISAAC HERRERA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- JACKSON PRIDEMORE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.