Brucker v. McKinlay Transport, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.
These consolidated appeals are before us on remand from the Supreme Court “for consideration of the issues raised by the parties in their briefs on appeal.” Brucker v McKinlay Transport, Inc, 454 Mich 8, 9, 19; 557 NW2d 536 (1997). We now reverse the June 8, 1992, order and judgment of the circuit court in plaintiff’s favor in the amount of $2,880,898.99 and remand for judgment to be entered *445in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $100,000 as required by the parties’ contract.
This dispute involves a long and complicated factual and procedural history. The facts surrounding this case have been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Kaleva-Norman-Dickson School District No. 6 v. Kalevanorman-Dickson School Teachers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Pakideh v. Franklin Commercial Mortgage Group, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- G & a INC v. NahraMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- BRUCKER v. McKINLAY TRANSPORT, INCMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ewing v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Treev, Inc. v. MSX InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Motion for Leave to Sue the Receiver of Venus Plaza Shopping CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Brucker v. McKinlay Transport, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Curtis v. FCA US, LLC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.