Territory of Hawaii v. McCandless
Hawaii Supreme Court
EXCEPTIONS PROM ClBCÜIT ÜOURT, FiJIST CIRCUIT.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
HARTWELL, C.J.
Tbe defendants were charged before the district court of Honolulu with violating Sec. 1 of the ordinance of the county of Oahu made August 28, 1907, entitled “Order No. 9 regula!.-■ ing the construction and maintenance of awnings, shades and balconies within the fire limits of Honolulu,” by maintaining an awning between the 1st and 23d days of October, 1907, not constructed of cloth or canvas, extending over a part of a public sidewalk, on their building at the makai Waikiki corner ol River and King streets, within the fire limits of Honolulu as defined in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. CowanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Cleveland v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Town of Washington v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Moran v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Territory v. SchaeferHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
- Territory v. DonderoHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
- Martinez v. ParadoHawaii Supreme Court · 1939
- Murphy v. McKayHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
- Territory v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1908