Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. McCandless

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EXCEPTIONS PROM ClBCÜIT ÜOURT, FiJIST CIRCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C.J.

Tbe defendants were charged before the district court of Honolulu with violating Sec. 1 of the ordinance of the county of Oahu made August 28, 1907, entitled “Order No. 9 regula!.-■ ing the construction and maintenance of awnings, shades and balconies within the fire limits of Honolulu,” by maintaining an awning between the 1st and 23d days of October, 1907, not constructed of cloth or canvas, extending over a part of a public sidewalk, on their building at the makai Waikiki corner ol River and King streets, within the fire limits of Honolulu as defined in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State v. CowanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Cleveland v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Town of Washington v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Moran v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Territory v. SchaeferHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Territory v. DonderoHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Martinez v. ParadoHawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Murphy v. McKayHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Territory v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API