Legal Opinion

Dingeman v. State Board of Canvassers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1917No. Calendar No. 27,941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus by Harry J. Dingeman to compel the State board of canvassers to refrain from recounting the ballots in an election of circuit judges.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Upon the face of the returns as canvassed by the county board of canvassers of Wayne county, and duly certified to the- defendant, the plaintiff was elected one of the circuit judges for the third judicial circuit at the general election held in April. No question is raised as to the regularity of the returns to the State board of canvassers. Had no contest been had, it must be conceded that it would have been the clear duty of the State board of canvassers to can*136vass the returns and issue to plaintiff a certificate of election. This was a ministerial duty to be performed by defendant. Acting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Royce v. GoodwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Belknap v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Dafoe v. HarshawMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wheeler v. Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Naumann v. Board of City CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Williams v. MaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Behrendt v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Angelic Johnson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2020
  5. O'Neill v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API