Legal Opinion
Bernard v. Hartford Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 3, 2009No. CA 09-71PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAUNDERS, Judge.
11 This is an automobile accident case where the plaintiff prevailed at trial, but was dissatisfied by the judgment rendered. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred by disregarding part of the uncon-troverted medical testimony of his treating physician, by using manifestly erroneous reasoning, and by awarding damages that were abusively low.
After reviewing the record, we find no merit to any of the plaintiffs assignments of error. As such, we affirm the trial court’s judgment and assess all costs of these proceedings to the plaintiff.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dore v. Mitsui Sumitomo Ins., USALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Williams v. MathieuLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Guidry v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Calvin Joseph Guidry, Jr., Et Ux. v. Lafayette Health Ventures, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.