In re Houston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice.
Relator, the City of Houston, has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking review of the trial court’s order granting a new trial.* After the trial court’s ruling, the Supreme Court of Texas decided In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., which announced that a trial court’s legally appropriate and reasonably specific order granting a new trial may be reviewed on its substantive merits in a mandamus proceeding. 407 S.W.3d 746, 758-59 (Tex.2013). Applying that standard of review to this case, we conditionally grant relief.
Background
On the night…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- McKinney v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- in Re Wyatt Field Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- in Re United Services Automobile Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Petroleum Workers Union of the Republic of Mexico v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- In re BCH Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- BCH Development, LLC v. Lakeview Heights Addition Property Owners' Association and Barbara WohlrabeTexas Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.