Legal Opinion

Town of Greenwood v. State ex rel. Lawson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1902No. 19,764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Johnson Circuit Court; W. J. Buckingham, Judge. Mandamus hy the State on the relation of Frank Lawson and others against the town of Greenwood and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

—The relators, contractors for the construction of a public work under the Barrett law, brought this proceeding to compel the hoard of trustees of the town of Greenwood, hy writ of mandamus, to take action upon the report made by the town engineer, under §4293 Bums 1901, §6776 Horner 1901, and either to “adopt, alter, or amend the same,” and “cause an assessment list” to he made, as required hy said law. An alternative writ was issued. Appellants filed a return in two paragraphs, the *268first of which, was a general denial. A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to the second paragraph of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. StackhouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Board of Commissioners v. FullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. City of Madison v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Welch v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Ellis v. Steuben CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spurgeon v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Brown v. Central Bermudez Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API