Van Cott v. State Tax Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Chief Justice.
The question for determination is whether or not the plaintiff’s salary as Agency counsel for the Salt Lake Agency pf the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, hereafter called the RFC, and his salary as counsel for the Regional Agricultural Credit Corporation of Salt Lake City, hereafter called the RACC, are either of them or both taxable income for the purpose of the state income tax law. The answer will depend on the character of these corporations, as to whether they exercise essential governmental functions or not. In submitting his report of taxable income for 1935,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Tax Commission v. Van CottSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Van Cott v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Van Cott v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939