Legal Opinion
People v. Singleton
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1988PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*847OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The Supreme Court order granting the People’s motion for reargument and adhering to its prior decision was a superseding order (see, People v Collier, 131 AD2d 864, lv granted 70 NY2d 954; Marine Midland Bank v Fisher, 85 AD2d 905; Siegel, NY Prac §254, at 313-314). Thus, the People’s notice of appeal from that order, filed within 30 days of its entry, was timely. Having resolved defendant’s appeal on this ground, we need not consider his alternate contention —that the People’s time to appeal to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. CoayeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MullinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. CollierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. EllisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Centennial Restorations Co. v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. Ashe, New York County Courts2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.