American Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
In Equity. Suit by the American Street Flushing Machine Company against the St. Rouis Street Flushing Machine Company and William Ratican. On report of master, and exceptions thereto by defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, District Judge.
This cause was begun in this court in 1905. It was tried by my predecessor, who entered an interlocutory decree in favor of complainant and referred the matter of accounting to Byron F. Babbitt, as master. An appeal was allowed to the Circuit Court of Appeals from the decree here entered in September, 1906. The decision of this court was affirmed, and the master proceeded to take testimony, and thereafter on the 9th of December, 1909, made his report and filed a transcript of the evidence taken. The master’s report concludes as follows:
“In view of all the foregoing, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Seymour v. McCormickSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Studebaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- American Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. City of AmsterdamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Studebaker Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1913