Dahlman v. Hammel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Calumet County. Defendant appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOetON, J.
This action was brought on tbe following guaranty, executed by tbe appellant: “For value received, I hereby guaranty tbe payment of tbe following promissory notes given by M. Kalm & Co. to Anthony Dahlman & Co.” *467This is followed by a description of four notes, of different amounts, payable in four, five, seven and eight months.
The appellant, in his answer, denies the copartnership of ICalm & Co., and their indebtedness to Dahlman & Co., and the giving of the notes, and sets up, in effect, that the guaranty was given upon the false and fraudulent representations of one Iiorst, the agent of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Watson's Executors v. McLarenNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Day v. ElmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- Eastman v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
- Second Ward Savings Bank v. ShakmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Williams v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by10 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. MabbottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Miami County National Bank v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Kuener v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. BlackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.