Legal Opinion

Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Black

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Consideration.

The respondent’s letter of July 30, 1960, was sufficient to meet the requirements of sec. 241.02 (2), Stats. When Mr. Milo Black prefaced his guaranty with the words, “In regard to credit rating for Gerald Black, . . .” he adequately expressed the consideration necessary to take the case from the statute of frauds, since it is clear from the record that the guaranty did not relate only to a past purchase. Miami County Nat. Bank v. Goldberg (1907), 133 Wis. 175, 113 N. W. 391; Waldheim v. Miller (1897), 97 Wis. 300, 72 N. W. 869; Young v. Brown (1881), 53 Wis. 333, 10 N. W. 394;…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  2. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Cothren v. LeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Taussig v. ReidIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mamerow v. National Lead Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wiegel v. Sentry Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Prize Steak Products, Inc. v. Bally's Tom Foolery, Inc., F/k/a Barnaby's Family Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Lee v. VaughnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Fond Du Lac Skyport, Inc. v. Moraine Airways, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. John Deere Co. v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API