Legal Opinion

State v. Leenhouts

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2008No. CR-07-0319-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 14.1 requires that a defendant not in custody be arraigned “within 30 days after the filing of an indictment” or “as soon as possible thereafter.” Ariz. R.Crim. P. 14.1(a), (b). We must decide whether the superior court erred in ordering a trial to proceed on a supervening indictment on the same day that the defendant learned of the supervening indictment. We hold that the superior court erred in requiring the trial to proceed.

I

¶ 2 In 2003, Ann Leenhouts began divorce proceedings against her then-husband. In August 2004,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DunganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. State v. Van VlietArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. VassarArizona Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FreeneyArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Monnette, 9-08-33 (4-6-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Ceasar v. Hon. campbell/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. James Scott Hislop v. State of Arizona, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API