Legal Opinion
United States v. Duran
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 16, 1995No. Crim. 94-447 (CRR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Government’s Motion In Limine for the Admission of Letters Written by Defendant Duran to His Wife and Son. The Court is not in receipt of any written Opposition thereto. The Court held a hearing on the same on March 15, 1995, at which time counsel for the Defendant opposed admission of the letters on relevance grounds. Counsel for the Defendant further represented that the admissibility of the letters would largely depend on the Court’s ruling on the Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). Upon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Roosevelt v. FoskeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Lawrence T. Day. United States of America v. Eric J. SheffeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- United States v. Patrick Thomas Strobehn, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LavinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- United States v. Red ElkDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.