Legal Opinion
People v. Robinson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to dismiss the indictment based on preindictment delay. The People established, inter alia, good cause for the delay and that the other relevant factors favor the prosecution (see People v Decker, 13 NY3d 12 [2009]; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442 [1975]; People v Finkelstein, 75 AD3d 652 [2010]; People v Jones, 267 AD2d 250 [1999]; People v Lee, 234 AD2d 140 [1996]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.E, Dillon, Balkin and Miller, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. FinkelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. OdumCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- People v. HarvinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2013
- People v. MattisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. OdumNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011