Legal Opinion

People v. Darling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Pine, J. P.

The issue before us on this appeal by the People is whether Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The court concluded that the warrant was not issued upon probable cause because, in the search warrant application, a detective of the Syracuse Police Department relied on conversations-seized pursuant to an allegedly unauthorized wiretap. We agree with the People that the conversations were properly seized and that those conversations provided probable cause *63for the issuance of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HanlonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. TambeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. MurgasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DeProsperoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. DarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. VaccaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. DEPROSPERO, STEPHEN, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API